Monday, May 16, 2005

Trigger-Happy US Troops 'Will Keep Us In Iraq For Years'

No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.10 - Release Date: 5/13/2005

Trigger-Happy US Troops 'Will Keep Us In Iraq For Years'

Sean Rayment
Telegraph (UK)
May 15, 2005)

British defence chiefs have warned United States military commanders in Iraq to change their rules for opening fire or face becoming bogged down in a terrorist war for a decade or more.

The Telegraph has learnt that the warning was issued last month in response to a series of incidents that led to the deaths of Iraqi civilians, mainly at checkpoints, after soldiers opened fire in the mistaken belief that they were being attacked by suicide bombers.

The warning is said to have taken the form of advice from senior officers who accompanied Gen Sir Mike Jackson, the chief of the General Staff, on a recent trip to southern Iraq and Baghdad to visit British troops.

A conversation took place between officers on the differences between British and American rules of engagement, during which British commanders expressed their concerns over the use of US tactics.

They attempted to explain that in their experience of post-war counter-insurgency operations it paid to adopt a low-key and less aggressive stance.

American officers were told that when the British Army had made mistakes, such as in Londonderry in Northern Ireland in 1972 when troops shot dead 13 civilians during a civil rights march, the political and military consequences had been disastrous.

In the past month alone in Iraq there have been more than 130 car bombings and 67 suicide attacks that have killed more than 400 people. The attacks have led to renewed fears among coalition officials that American and Iraqi forces are losing the fight against the insurgency.

According to senior British officers, US military operations are typified by "force protection" - the protection of troops at all costs - that allows American troops to open fire, using whatever means available, if they believe that their lives are under threat.

By contrast, the British military has a graduated response to a threat and its rules of engagement are based on the principle of minimum force. Troops also have to justify their actions in post-operation reports that are reviewed by the Royal Military Police, and any discrepancy can lead to charges including murder.

A British officer said that some of the tactics employed by American forces would not be approved by British commanders.

The officer said: "US troops have the attitude of shoot first and ask questions later. They simply won't take any risk.*

"It has been explained to US commanders that we made mistakes in Northern Ireland, namely Bloody Sunday, and paid the price.

"I explained that their tactics were alienating the civil population and could lengthen the insurgency by a decade. Unfortunately, when we ex-plained our rules of engagement which are based around the principle of minimum force, the US troops just laughed."

_____________________________________________________________________

* One of these days the American troops won't even wait to get to Iraq. They'll start shooting as soon as they get on the military transport planes
taking them there - just to be sure.
KJG

1 Comments:

At Tuesday, May 17, 2005, Blogger Perun said...

A little bit of common sense is everything we (human society - looking at it more globaly -I'm not american)need. Sometimes I wonder how come educated people in positions of power, wether politic - behind a wheel of a state, or economic - behind the wheel of a country, seem to lack that little thing we call common sense - no need to be educated at all to posess that, it comes inside the original package, some people just seem to lose it along the way.

As for iraq, I think americans have lost their hearts and minds campain long time ago. I see them pulling out sooner or later, leaving Iraq in political havoc and struggle for power. I had a rather heated discussion over interned with an american coleague over the position of US in Iraq, and in the end, just before we agreed to disagree, I asked him: "Just tell me this one thing - for a moment forget that you are american, if suddenly, some other country brought its troops en-masse to your country, ocupied it, started shooting at everything that moves, took possesion of your raw material sources, how would you respond?" He said "I would do everything in my power to drive them out". And so I said ... "So you love your country - so do Iraqis". Maybe I am pesimistic, but I believe that if, when US troops pull out, even a tiny trace of democracy they brought so forcefully remains behind, it will be suffocated and erased and replaced with even more strict regime than it was before, because the little taste of democracy Iraq got is very bloody to them. I still believe that democracy is a natural process that has to be evolved into rather than enforced.

I love your blog by the way, text as these remind me that there still are sane people on the other side of the ocean.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home